9 of 17 organizations Jeff And Marieke Rothschild Foundation funded in FY2024 had not been funded in the prior 3 years.
Across all compared years the rate is 64.1%. Foundations of a similar size sit at 31.9%.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY | $5,500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION | $5,000,000 |
| PRESIDENT & TRUSTEES OF COLBY COLLEGEnew | $5,000,000 |
| REWILDnew | $2,500,000 |
| NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST | $2,000,000 |
| FOOD FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCnew | $1,600,000 |
| LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY | $1,000,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC | $1,000,000 |
| RAINBOW WORLD FUND | $1,000,000 |
| AVINA AMERICAS INCnew | $1,000,000 |
| CLEAN SLATE INITIATIVE INCnew | $1,000,000 |
| EVERY CURE INCnew | $1,000,000 |
| GREAT BARRIER REEF FOUNDATION USA INCnew | $500,000 |
| KENYAN KIDS FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| LIFESPAN EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INCnew | $263,000 |
| NP2 | $250,000 |
| INKOMOKOnew | $100,000 |
Every US private foundation files Form 990-PF, and Part XV of that return itemises each grant it paid, with the recipient's name. Lining those lists up across filing years shows which organizations were funded for the first time.
That does work the application checkbox cannot. Whether a foundation says it accepts unsolicited proposals is self-reported and never audited. The grant ledger is behaviour.
Every figure here comes from your own filings. If one looks wrong I would rather hear it than keep publishing it — write to me and I will show you the filings and the arithmetic behind it, and correct it if it is off.